Federal Election: What’s At Stake For Solar & Batteries

Chris Bowen campaigns during the election in front of signs promoting solarAustralians are heading to the polls tomorrow to elect their next government. Here’s what each major party’s plans are for battery rebates,  EV tax breaks, gas plans, and nuclear’s impact on rooftop solar.

Coalition Cuts

In its release of costings on Thursday the Coalition announced it will axe a raft of programs related to home electrification and green energy. Programs set to be axed include:

  • The $26 billion Future Made in Australia Program;
  • The $19 billion Rewiring the Nation Program;
  • The $16 billion National Reconstruction Fund;
  • The Net Zero Economy Agency.

Funding to Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water will also be cut substantially, while plans for additional funding for ARENA and the Clean Energy Finance Corporation will be curtailed.

Labor’s Home Battery Rebate

Central to Labor’s election campaign is the $2.3bn Cheaper Home Batteries Program, which the Coalition costings reveal would not be supported under a Dutton government.

Zappi 2 home charger

The Coalition has pledged to get rid of the fringe benefit tax exemption for electric vehicles and EV charging equipment.

Electric Vehicle Tax Breaks

A key sticking point this election has been the fringe benefit tax on electric vehicles, which allows Australians to lease an eligible EV through their employer without paying FBT.

  • Opposition Leader Peter Dutton initially promised to protect this lucrative tax break for electric cars, but his party backflipped days later by declaring it would be scrapped;
  • The Coalition instead is focusing on petrol vehicles, vowing to halve fuel excise for 12 months and abolish incoming fuel efficiency penalties;
  • The EV fringe benefits tax exemption, which Labor has vowed to keep in place, can also apply to EV home charger equipment;
  • Depending on your novated lease provider, you can salary-sacrifice the hardware and installation costs of a home EV charger and other charging accessories if they are offered in your lease package.

Gas Versus Electrification

The Coalition has proposed doubling down on gas to reduce energy prices with a plan that includes reserving gas for domestic use on Australia’s east coast.

  •  This is despite SolarQuotes analysis that finds almost every Australian household would save considerable amounts of money by getting off gas;
  • Our in-house fact checker Ronald Brakels looked into claims made during the election that gas is efficient and vital to keeping Australian homes warm. Ronald found that in almost all cases alternative electric appliances are more efficient to run.
Mums for Nuclear ad -- "Nuclear energy reduces energy costs by 25%"

A nuclear lobby group has been making misleading claims about nuclear energy – ignoring the cost to owners of rooftop solar.

Nuclear Impact on Solar

Another key energy policy proposed by the Coalition is a plan to roll out nuclear power stations in the coming decades.

The Greens are campaigning on a promise to give renters the right to get solar.

Solar For Renters

The Greens unveiled a plan to expand access to solar for renters by giving them the right to request systems be installed by their landlords.

  • Under the Renters Right To Solar scheme, tenants would be able to request a solar panel system up to 8kW capacity be installed at their rental properties;
  • Landlords would only be able to deny the tenant’s request on reasonable grounds, such as body corporate rules precluding it, engineering challenges or local electricity network constraints;
  • A new $10bn fund established through publicly-owned Snowy Hydro would pick up the tab for the installations initially, but landlords would need to pay for the systems over time;
  • Finn thinks that landlords have always been too big a barrier to solar access for renters, and as an alternative has proposed plug-and-play batteries which renters can take with them whenever they move as a solution.

After The Election

Once the election result is clear, we’ll continue to provide analysis on the home electrification policy platform of the next federal government.

Next week and beyond, we’ll cover what the election result means for solar, batteries and EV chargers, and everything else to do with home electrification. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter for a complete rundown.

 

About Max Opray

Journalist Max Opray joined SolarQuotes in 2025 as editor, bringing with him over a decade of experience covering green energy. Across his career Max has won multiple awards for his feature stories for The Guardian and The Saturday Paper, fact-checked energy claims for Australian Associated Press, launched the climate solutions newsletter Climactic, and covered the circular economy for sustainability thinktank Metabolic. Max also reported on table tennis at the 2016 Rio Olympics — and is patiently waiting for any tenuous excuse to include his ping pong expertise in a SolarQuotes story.

Comments

  1. Yes, this election is certainly a watershed moment for Australia when it comes to the environment and our power system.
    Hopefully “Temu Trump” and his mates do not get the treasury benches tomorrow.

  2. It would be useful to list where minor parties sit given we still need to fill out a Senate paper with many preferences.

  3. Patrick says

    Thanks for this info. It seems clear the LNP’s policies would trash the transition to clean, safe, efficient and less costly renewables.

    Given only Labor or the LNP can practically form government in our system currently, the choice at this election seems absolutely stark to me. If you want clean, reliable and less expensive energy in Australia, Labor is offering it and the LNP isn’t.

    Things won’t be perfect through the transition period to renewables but electricity will be cleaner and more reliable going down Labor’s renewables path than the LNP “plan”. In five to 10 years time, we will have built a solid renewables based grid plus heaps of home solar and batteries.

    With the LNP’s approach, we will definitely have less reliable electricity at much greater cost. And not just for 10 years but forever.

    Remember what they did to the NBN? Theirs was supposed to be “sufficient, sooner, reliable and cheaper”. It wasn’t any of these and is still being fixed at higher cost.

    • Anthony Bennett says

      Thanks Patrick,

      The NBN is a perfect example of nation building… that’s been squandered by the LNP.

  4. Peter Johnston says

    Yes for all the above reasons labour needs another 3 years

  5. If it was up to me I would be lifting the nuclear ban and establishing a nuclear energy taskforce with the goal of establishing a framework around preparing the groundwork for starting a nuclear industry. I would call this a sensible insurance policy for at least being open to whatever technology we might need going forward. Maybe we will not adopt nuclear in its current form but better to be prepared than not.

    No matter what happens we wont be getting nuclear before 2050 and we should be more concerned about the difficulties we will encounter on this very difficult task that is before us.

    There is a lot said about how the future climate could turn extreme yet the current plan is to transition to a completely weather dependant system. If people cannot keep an open mind about future possibilities then how can you possibly make rational logic based decisions.

    • Anthony Bennett says

      Hi Peter,

      The economics haven’t favoured nuclear since the Howard days, and he’s the one who made it illegal.

      We’ve been down this road before:
      2007 Howard’s Switkowski Report: Nuclear would be double the price of coal or gas however carbon pricing could make nuclear power cost competitive

      2016 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Report: it would not be viable in SA to develop a nuclear power station.

      2016 SA Citizen’s Jury on Nuclear Waste: 66% of the Jury do not want nuclear to proceed under any circumstances: no First Nations consent, poor economics, unsubstantiated modelling, high cost of infrastructure, undermines SA’s reputation as a green state.

    • Anthony Bennett says

      Also Peter,

      AEMO GenCost 2020-2024 says nuclear is 5x the cost of renewables and batteries and 3x the time.

      2019 Senate Committee said not economically unviable in Australia.

      2020 Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry: nuclear without enormous subsidies is economically unviable.

      2022: former Chief Scientist Alan Finkel admits: “[nuclear is] nowhere near the level to justify the government seriously considering it…. it’s hard to see any nuclear in Australia in less than 20 years,”

      https://mckellinstitute.org.au/research/articles/explainer-heres-why-the-evidence-suggest-nuclear-doesnt-make-sense-for-australia/

      If nuclear was so good why didn’t anything happen in the last decade under the last LNP government?

      Its too slow to implement and too expensive.

      Talking about nuclear steam engines is just a waste of time designed to create distraction & doubt… which suits the coal & gas industry.

Speak Your Mind

Please keep the SolarQuotes blog constructive and useful with these 5 rules:

1. Real names are preferred - you should be happy to put your name to your comments.
2. Put down your weapons.
3. Assume positive intention.
4. If you are in the solar industry - try to get to the truth, not the sale.
5. Please stay on topic.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Get the latest solar, battery and EV charger news straight to your inbox every Tuesday