
Images of DIY winter coats for Fox batteries – shared on FB by Australian owners
Fox ESS batteries recently became the most popular battery in Australia thanks to their nice stackable design and a price that undercuts most of the competition. When asked, my personal verdict on Fox has been: I don’t have enough real-world data to vouch for their quality in harsh Australian conditions, and I’ve consistently recommended waiting for a couple of summers before committing.
Turns out it’s not the summers I should have been watching.
It’s early May. Not even winter. Melbourne hit 8°C the other day – reasonably chilly for Melbourne, sure, but hardly Hobart in July – and Fox battery owners started posting. One reported their 10kW system throttling back to 3.8kW. Others chimed in with similar stories. The batteries aren’t broken. They’re just doing what lithium batteries do when they get cold: they get cautious, limit charge and discharge rates, and in some cases trigger forced charging to warm themselves up.
This is a known issue with lithium batteries. The solution, in cold climates, is a battery heater, a small heating element built into the unit that keeps the cells above the threshold where chemistry gets sluggish.
Fox, like many budget battery manufacturers, didn’t include heaters in some of their Australian models.
I can only think of one reason to do that: cost. Specifically, the pressure to hit a low enough price per kilowatt-hour to get as close as possible to the dollar amount per kilowatt-hour of the battery rebate. It’s a rational commercial decision. It’s also a decision that seems to have been made by someone who has never spent a winter in Hobart, or apparently Melbourne.
This is particularly bad news for owners of Fox’s larger battery systems without heaters. The big stackable configurations, some pushing 48kWh, were a huge part of Fox’s appeal. Buyers were transfixed by the idea of a massive battery at a price that would have seemed impossible two years ago. But a big battery creates a big problem in winter. Unless you have a solar array the size of a tennis court, the only realistic way to fill a 48kWh battery in winter is force charging from the grid during off-peak or free-energy windows. And when you’re doing that, you want to charge at full rate – you’ve got a limited window and a lot of kilowatt-hours to shift. If the cold is crippling your charge rate, you’re simply not going to fill the battery in time1.
In every major Australian city except Brisbane and Darwin, winter energy demand for heating exceeds summer demand for cooling. If your battery can’t be reliably filled in winter, your return on investment takes a serious hit.
What worries me more than the performance throttling is what some owners are doing about it. Enterprising Aussies, faced with a battery that won’t charge properly on a cold morning, are improvising. We’re talking rockwool wrapped in glad wrap. Insulating board strapped around the whole stack. Full DIY overcoats on a device that contains a significant amount of stored energy and needs specific clearances for cooling.
Fox has actually published guidance on this for their UK customers, who ran into the same problem. It specifies flame-retardant materials, minimum clearances from electrical components, what not to block. It also includes this note: improper insulation may lead to elevated internal temperatures, accelerated degradation, or even thermal runaway. You assume all associated risks.
That scares the shit out of me. Because the Australian owners improvising with glad wrap may not have read it. What happens when a Melbourne winter turns into a Melbourne summer, or we have on of those freak warm winter days and someone forgets to remove the insulating board they strapped on? Nothing good.
A few caveats worth stating clearly. Fox will not be the only battery on sale in Australia with this problem – they’re just the ones we’re hearing about, and that’s largely because they’ve become the best-selling battery in the country. When something goes wrong with the most popular product in a market, you hear about it first and loudest. Other brands may have the same cold-weather limitation and we simply don’t know yet because their sales volumes are lower.
It’s also worth noting that before the Cheaper Home Battery Scheme and before batteries got cheap enough that 50kWh systems were suddenly within reach of ordinary households, almost nobody needed to charge their battery at full tilt in winter. Smaller batteries, slower charging, milder use cases – if the issue existed not many people would even notice. The rebate changed everything.
I’m updating my verdict on Fox ESS batteries. It used to be: wait and see how they handle a couple of Australian summers. I’m adding to it: we also need to see how they manage a couple of Australian winters. Early May in Melbourne shouldn’t be breaking a sweat.
Footnotes
- if this is you – have a look at your quote – it should have performance and savings estimates – if those estimates assume full charging power all through winter – you should talk to your retailer about Express Warranties and Australian Consumer Law ↩
RSS - Posts

I’m a little disappointed that you’re singling out FoxESS on this, I’ve come to expect more balanced journalism from SolarQuotes. I have installs with 7 other top brand lithium batteries that experience the exact same issue with reduced charge rate. But because the arrays are well sized for winter production, it doesn’t actually have an impact on performance. Needing the battery to charge at 1C in winter is bad design because either the PV array would be oversized, or there would be too much maximum demand on the grid charging.
Did you read the whole post?
Yes I read the whole post and note that you included a caveat towards the end. However the headline unfairly singles out FoxESS, and the article doesn’t address the issue that limited charge rates don’t actually have much impact on system performance on a well designed system. You quote a 10kW system throttling back to 3.8kW – it would be more interesting to know if 10kW was the Pnom of the PV array, and what the expected output was at the time given azimuth, orientation and efficiency. Or was it set to charge at 10kW from the grid but was instead reduced by the BMS to 3.8kW? Was it a 10kWh battery? If so, why would you set the grid charge rate to 1C? What was the actual error message from the monitoring software? It’s quite possible that there was a notification that because of low temperature the charge rate was restricted, but that the available PV and/or grid charge was below the restricted charge rate anyway and so wasn’t affecting performance.
Did you also read the bit that explains this has become an issue now because of all the 48kWh systems made possible by the rebate?
We’ve never sold the Fox ESS and we never will.
I am wondering if Sungrow batteries have a heater in them
No they don’t.