Carmichael Mine Coal Ready To Contribute To Climate Havoc

Queensland Carmichael coal mine

Adding to the general crappiness across 2021 is another bit to help top it off. The first shipment of coal from Adani’s Carmichael mine in Queensland is ready for export.

Construction of Bravus Mining & Resources’1 Carmichael coal mine 160km northwest of Clermont started in June 2019 after all final approvals were received.

The mine will produce 10 million tonnes of coal per annum and the company is keen to ramp up to that as fast as possible.

Adani has previously stated:

“The process of mining 10 million tonnes of coal per annum at the Carmichael mine will produce 240,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions.

That’s just the bit where they pull the problematic rock from the ground. The process of transporting and burning those 10 million tonnes of coal produced annually will result in millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions, and this could go on for decades. Whether it’s burned here or anywhere else doesn’t make a difference as we all share the same atmosphere. 

Add to the carbon emissions are toxins including particulate matter2, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury and arsenic. Mining and burning coal has a massive negative impact on human health; not to mention that of the wider environment.

Adani’s celebration of this first load makes a mockery of Australia’s commitment to ‘phase down’ coal at the COP26 summit said the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF).

The amount of coal Adani/Bravus will mine each year is far less than what it originally intended. It has approvals for up to 60 million tonnes per annum. But in a world that really can’t afford to be burning any more of the stuff, it’s all bad news and helps reaffirm Australia’s status as a Typhoid Mary of fossil fuel emissions.

Adani “In Violation Of International Human Rights”

Many are still actively opposed to this mine for various reasons – not just environmental – and haven’t given up fighting it. Among them are the Wangan and Jagalingou people. 

Adrian Burragubba, Nagana Yarrbayn Senior Elder and spokesperson for the Wangan and Jagalingou Cultural Custodian stated yesterday:

“Wangan and Jagalinagou people first said no to Adani’s mine in 2012, and we continue to say no. Adani has never had Free Prior and Informed Consent from the Wangan and Jagalingou people.”

Mr. Burragubba says without the approval from the Original Custodians, Adani is in violation of International Human Rights.

“We will continue to resist Adani’s coal mine, practice our culture, and assert our human rights as the First Nations people of this country.”

And more power to them for doing so.

But perhaps market and other forces may also bring the mine undone.

“No bank is prepared to fund the Carmichael mine, instead Adani’s parent company is coughing up the finance,” says ACF. “With the world turning its back on coal, the future of this mine remains uncertain.”

Unfortunately, the world isn’t quite ready to totally shun coal yet. Last week, Federal Minister for Resources and Water Keith Pitt3 was crowing about the December edition of the Resources and Energy Quarterly (REQ) indicating thermal coal export values are expected to rise from $16 billion in 2020–21 to $35 billion in 2021–22.

What Minister Pitt didn’t mention is a subsequent easing to $27 billion by 2022–23 is indicated.

But that’s still a lot of coal.

Footnotes

  1. The Adani Group re-branded its Australian business to Bravus Mining & Resources last year. A turd is still a turd by any other name, but the name change was supposedly to reflect the courage shown by the company in pursuing this project given the challenges (opposition) it faced. However, apparently the Latin word “bravus” could be more accurately translated as “crooked” or “mercenary”. Enough said.
  2. Particulate matter can also impact on solar energy production
  3. Minister Pitt is the only Minister we’re aware of to block SolarQuotes from his Twitter feed. We’re not sure why.
About Michael Bloch

Michael caught the solar power bug after purchasing components to cobble together a small off-grid PV system in 2008. He's been reporting on Australian and international solar energy news ever since.

Comments

  1. George Kaplan says

    Correct me if I’m mistaken, but isn’t this mine supposed to offer a lot of jobs? Given all the unemployment at present that should help make it popular. And according to one newspaper article I skimmed on the subject, the jobs v environment debate is what returned the Coalition to power in 2019.

    The point about banks refusing financing is alarming. Oh perhaps there was an actual economic case behind the refusal which justified it, but it’s the second story I’ve seen today about banks refusing financing to organisations they politically oppose. Banks aren’t supposed to be political! Should that occur then Left and Right will continue to disengage from one another – follow different news, bank with different institutions, support mutually exclusive cultural and ethic standards, live in different areas, vote differently, and effectively live in different countries. That way lies Balkanisation. : (

    • Ronald Brakels says

      When environmental costs are included, investing in a coal mine is not the optimal use of resources. If business people have to pay the environmental costs of their actions then they will instead invest in the next best option.

    • George Kaplan,
      Correct me if I’m mistaken, but isn’t this mine supposed to offer a lot of jobs?

      At best, it’s short-term only. Per the PNAS paper titled Future of the human climate niche:

      We demonstrate that depending on scenarios of population growth and warming, over the coming 50 y, 1 to 3 billion people are projected to be left outside the climate conditions that have served humanity well over the past 6,000 y. Absent climate mitigation or migration, a substantial part of humanity will be exposed to mean annual temperatures warmer than nearly anywhere today.

      The northern third of mainland Australia could be unliveable by 2070. In other words, NO JOBS, no future, in the longer-term. See Figure 3 at: https://www.pnas.org/content/117/21/11350#F3

      From a post at Verisk Maplecroft by Will Nichols and Rory Clisby on Dec 16, headlined 40% of oil and gas reserves threatened by climate change, it begins with:

      More than 600 billion barrels equivalent of the world’s commercially recoverable oil and gas reserves are facing high or extreme risks from more frequent storms and floods, rising sea levels, and temperature extremes. According to our Climate Change Exposure Indices, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Nigeria are among the oil and gas producing countries where the risk of climate related events disrupting the flow of oil to global markets is highest. Between them, these three countries account for nearly 19% of commercially recoverable oil and gas.

      Climate-related supply threats to the oil and gas industry have already begun to manifest. This year a freeze in Texas knocked US oil and gas output to a three-year low, while Hurricane Ida caused a record 55 spills in the Gulf of Mexico and created historic disruptions to the supply of both crude oil and refined products. Record heat in Russia accelerated the melting of permafrost, a trend that has damaged 40% of buildings and infrastructure in northern regions heavily reliant on oil and gas production.

      https://www.maplecroft.com/insights/analysis/40-of-oil-and-gas-reserves-threatened-by-climate-change/

      Ironic – fossil fuel industries threatened by escalating climate crisis.

  2. I don’t think that this type of blog / topic should be on this website

    Cheers

    James M

Speak Your Mind

Please keep the SolarQuotes blog constructive and useful with these 5 rules:

1. Real names are preferred - you should be happy to put your name to your comments.
2. Put down your weapons.
3. Assume positive intention.
4. If you are in the solar industry - try to get to the truth, not the sale.
5. Please stay on topic.

Get The SolarQuotes Weekly Newsletter