Are Synergy’s Batteries Gaming WA’s Power Market?

Synergy Kwinana battery storage

Western Australia’s government-owned Synergy has an unusual position in the electricity market: it owns some of the state’s biggest batteries, as well as generators selling electricity into the same market.

New analysis has found its batteries sometimes charging at surprisingly high wholesale prices in the middle of the night, helping push those prices even higher. On the one hand, Synergy is paying more to charge its batteries. On the other hand, its generators could benefit from higher wholesale prices.

The prices discussed in this article are wholesale electricity prices. Individual price spikes don’t flow directly through to the regulated tariffs that most WA households and small businesses pay. But persistently higher wholesale costs can ultimately affect the cost of supplying electricity in WA.

When Does Battery Trading Become A Problem?

Normally, batteries make money through a simple strategy: charge when electricity is cheap and discharge when it’s expensive. It’s called energy arbitrage.

Home battery owners can do much the same, particularly with electricity plans that vary in price. The important difference is that your home battery takes the electricity price as given.

Synergy’s batteries are now big enough to help determine that price. WA’s Economic Regulation Authority (ERA) says batteries set the state’s real-time wholesale electricity price during 86% of dispatch intervals in the first half of 2026. This happens more often while charging than discharging.

So Synergy isn’t simply responding to wholesale prices when deciding when to charge. Its batteries can influence the very prices at which its generators sell.

And that’s exactly what a new analysis of Synergy’s alleged battery trading has put under the spotlight.

The Evidence Behind The Concern

Modo Energy analyst Marcus Freese examined an extraordinary period between 1 AM and 2 AM on July 12, when Synergy ramped up its battery charging from 229 MW to 640 MW.

The extra load added roughly a third to electricity demand at the overnight trough, while wholesale prices climbed from around $120/MWh to more than $350/MWh.

Freese found this wasn’t an isolated event.

Across 71 high-price charging days, Synergy’s batteries paid $7.3 million for electricity while Synergy-owned generation earned $18.4 million during those events.

Synergy battery generation revenue

Synergy battery charging costs and generation revenue across 71 high-price charging days. Source: Modo Energy analysis.

Those figures don’t mean Synergy pocketed the $11.1 million difference, nor do they prove the batteries caused all that generation revenue.

They do illustrate the potential portfolio incentive.

“A high charging offer increases the price paid by the battery, but it can also increase the price earned by generation in the same portfolio,” Freese says.

Freese also modelled what would have happened on July 12 if Synergy had charged its batteries differently. He found they could have bought the same amount of electricity while charging more when prices were cheaper, and the peak wholesale price would have been lower.

The Regulator Is Already Looking At The Problem

Interestingly, WA’s electricity market regulator, the ERA, had already identified precisely this potential problem.

Its August 6 discussion paper on the battery market offers says that an operator owning both batteries and generators could have an incentive to submit high-priced charging offers that increase market prices. This could happen even when those prices aren’t justified by the battery’s own costs, opportunity costs, or operating requirements.

It’s not the first time Synergy’s market behaviour has come under scrutiny. In 2022, the Electricity Review Board found Synergy had breached market rules by making generation offers linked to its market power.

The ERA says: “Charging offers should reflect the efficient operation of the individual BESS Facility, not the Market Participant’s portfolio.”

It also warns that portfolio-based behaviour may raise concerns under electricity market rules covering conduct that distorts or manipulates wholesale prices.

None of this establishes that Synergy’s current battery trading has broken any rules.

Freese says market data alone can’t prove why a battery charges at high prices. Batteries may need stored energy to meet future grid obligations, while rapidly changing price forecasts can make apparently strange charging decisions seem perfectly reasonable.

Synergy’s Response

Synergy has not publicly provided a specific explanation for why its batteries were charging during the high-price periods identified in the analysis.

In a statement reported by the ABC, the government-owned retailer instead pointed to batteries being relatively new technology whose capabilities would continue to be monitored and refined, and said they allowed more renewable energy into the system:

“while enhancing system reliability through rapid response to changing system conditions”.

WA Energy Minister Amber-Jade Sanderson also declined to address the specific trading behaviour, instead defending the state’s broader energy strategy:

“We’ve always said that the most reliable and affordable energy mix for the future is renewables backed by batteries and gas.”

She also stressed that regulated households and small businesses are shielded from wholesale price movements.

Batteries Aren’t The Villain Here

Big batteries are already helping WA absorb increasing amounts of renewable energy and smooth out wholesale prices. The issue is what happens when batteries become powerful enough not merely to respond to electricity prices, but to influence them.

That’s particularly uncomfortable when the batteries are government-owned, and their owner also has generators, potentially benefiting from higher wholesale prices.

There may be a perfectly reasonable explanation for Synergy’s charging behaviour. But without one, it’s a lousy look for batteries, which are relied upon to help deliver a cheaper, cleaner electricity system, and it risks undermining confidence in the renewable energy transition.

For more on Australia’s changing energy market, minus the industry jargon, sign up for the free SolarQuotes newsletter.

About Kim Wainwright

A solar installer and electrician in a previous life, Kim has been blogging for SolarQuotes since 2022. He enjoys translating complex aspects of the solar industry into content that the layperson can understand and digest. He spends his time reading about renewable energy and sustainability, while simultaneously juggling teaching and performing guitar music around various parts of Australia. Read Kim's full bio.

Speak Your Mind

Please keep the SolarQuotes blog constructive and useful with these 5 rules:

1. Real names are preferred - you should be happy to put your name to your comments.
2. Put down your weapons.
3. Assume positive intention.
4. If you are in the solar industry - try to get to the truth, not the sale.
5. Please stay on topic.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Get the latest solar, battery and EV charger news straight to your inbox every Tuesday